The dog in the channel barked in his master's voice , casting shame upon the noble creature planted in the archaic gramophone records.The creature in the sub animal folio of evolution takes pride in the pedigree of the Trojan horse .Yes, Trojan horse is a genuine martyr. He is a frame in disguise. smuggled in to the quarters of funded festival, playing murder of truth at the risk of his life .. He obtains a post in the Marxist daily on its way to ideological decline The Trojan mass of a cheat is anyhow inferior to the dog who comprehends no language other than his master speaks. The dog while being loyal to his master is direct and honest and he lives not in disguise to stab on the back .of his foe or brother in contrast to the wooden frame of betrayal. , the Trojan horse. The post modern wooden beast while serving the Marxist daily , quits the post in pride to join the channel which offers him better wages for sumptuous betrayal . Then the notaries and votaries of CIA in the Marxist gambling house identify the traitor talent of the wooden beast, and offer him a luxurious post, for bettering his track record of betrayal. He registers his obnoxious clairvoyance under the patronage of the minister married to CIA and USAID, and mimicks the impotent expressions of arrogance drawn from the fierce cerebral sterility of his master and minister of infinite moral nothingness
The bespectacled malevolence dressed in suit and coat appears in the channel to molest truth in defence of the CIA minister, an accomplished financial criminal. He claims the task of overhauling the media institution.!!Paatom exposed the story of the finance minister's matrimonial contract with the USAID lady who receives croes from anonymous sources , Ford , USAID etc. The overhauler-creature in the channel fails to defend the honourable matrimonial partner of the minister as her alliance with USAID is irrevocable and so he procreates an incident of divorce in the monograph of the criminal minister. But as he overhauls the matrimonial graph of his master, he fails to produce authentic evidence. The official website of Kerala government gives evidence to the subsistence of the matrimony still unhurt ;and the channel surveyor fails to overhaul official website which spits upon the ugly face that manipulates the farce of a divorce probably in stealthy connivance with the couple.
The persons involved in espionage, proceeding forth a life in disguise ,may enact the drama of divorce and matrimony for opportunistic gains. They live in falsified identity with respect to paternity and matrimony. The minister who announces the defamation occurred to Richard Franke (the CIA reptile that lays eggs to feed the poisonous CIA spy Rabindra singh who meets him in the Kerala resort, -- adduced from the Frontline story ), announces that his feeder of grants,Franke is married to lady Barbara Chasin. Then a person who claims to be a loyal follower and friend of Franke even from his embryonic days, suspects the matrimony that has been attested by the Kerala minister. The minister highly anxious of the unviolated chastity of Franke's matrimony does not feel his master's fame insulted as another loyal dependant of Franke destabilises the matrimonial accord scripted by his ministerial eyes.The minister swears that his grantmaster is married to a particular lady and when another person not less authentic upon the anthropomorphising adventures of the CIA persons, questions the veracity of the matrimony that has been reported by the ministerial tongue ,Franke as well as minister Issac falls dumb. No question of defamation against a statement that reduces the ministerial researcher and scholar, as dis informer of the matrimonial affair of the U.S. national.. Franke does not dispute his matrimony sanctified by the minister nor he does dispute the informer who destabilises his nuptial affair .This is the way the CIA community performs the act of morphing matrimony; A shady chapter in the programme of anthropomorphising.It is not the conventional process of giving human shapes to to the nonhuman pets. Here. the nonhuman ones are given human appearance by a mishap of biological birth but they love a life in disguise and renounce the concept of the original.(red salute to comrade Baudrillad and co. who defy the very concept of the original) Impersonation is instinctual urge and psycho perversion that takes a spy back to his subhuman tropic.Matrimony is a human affair. By morphing matrimony into divorce or destabilising the matrimony with fantasy of divorce, a creature dressed in human flesh expresses a desire to live in the subhuman under world which is the natal habitat of the CIA community.
So there is nothing unfair if Franke doesn't feel insulted when he is made the husband of Barbara. The matrimony is authored by Issac minister in the Kerala cabinet.Nor he does feel defamed when his loyal friend disputes the matrimony authored by Issac.He is married and not married to Barbara Chasin!.It is the the death of the author ,(of matrimony) minister Issac.With a fresh reading of the CIA reptile's hidden mission, the meaning is deferred. This is the way they deconstruct marriage. This is the way they morph their identity for espionage activities.
Issac's latest production in printing, a self effacing , self abusing document , a book,an imposition of shame maligned with contradictions and lies is dedicated to Franke, but there he ignores the existence of Barbara whose reputation also was in peril as per the press petition filed by Issac.Issac forgets the idea of Franke--Barbara matrimony he revealed to the press and avoids reference to the matrimony in his book as it is disputed by Franke's bosom friend. So the matrimonial identity of the US national proposed by the Indian minister is a coward's lie that mystifies the identity of the man on espionage mission.
Yes, Franke is married and not married to Barbara and they lived together in Nadur in central Kerala which is a nonexistent place . Issac argues that the cover of anthropological research is a legitimate excuse by which a US spy suspect is authorised to create nonexistent places for him to conduct his clandestine activities in Kerala morphing its geospatial names of reference. And the curious result of the anthropological research is that not a single letter in the print out of the research product, carries even a distant Kinship to field anthropology.
There is no wonder in Issac stretching headlong by the reptile master's trail in the matter of matrimony.To confuse the identity of the self, is part of the espionage technology.Matrimony is an identity signature. Issac and Franke expose it and erase it and pose themselves as married ,living together or divorced. Franke is married and not married. Issac is married ,divorced and not divorced.
. As the tribal head of the USAID in Kerala, Franke is supposed to play foul tricks even in his personal matter of matrimony for he was deputed by the US to falsify objective reality.
But in the political industry of India there occurs no such illicit precedent of a minister issuing a matrimonial certificate to a US national, that is ably challenged by another Indian citizen.The government or passport verification authorities do not question the persons involved in the dispute over the matrimonial identity of the US national. The foreigner in the biographical note of his book states that, he lived in a nonexistent place in kerala. Though he pretends to be an anthropologist . he never cares to claim that he did anthropological research in the non existent Kerala village. He states in clear terms that he did a study of the impact of land reforms in the village he names Nadur and such a study has nothing to do with structural anthropology or field anthropology.
Yet the Kerala minister justifies falsification of the the name of the place where the US spy executed his Kerala mission foregrounding a ridiculous excuse of anthropological research. And the person still remains a member in the cabinet and not an inmate in the central jail.
Paatom agitated the national security issues linked to the minister's matrimony with a USAID lady who is a US national who shores crores of dollars and maintains immovable and movable assets in US which make a substantial bolus of the minister's family income and asset. The minister is committed to the foreign contribution regulation act of India whereas it is irrelevant in the case of the minister's US wife. The US wife in effect shields the minister in a better way than the Swiss bank; The wife receives anonymous funds and runs an NGO in Hyderabad ,the nursery of CIA terrorism improvised under the banner of Mao.
As Paatom exposed the anti -national factor in Issac's marriage with the USAID lady , the overhauler and manipulator of media truth in the CPM channel came out with the fable of divorce .As per the version of the CPM channel ,minister Issac is a divorcee and maintains no wife and children in US. But, the fable of divorce decorated with pseudo sentimental tentacles is not yet reported to the government of Kerala or its legislature secretary. The official websites of the government,legislature and the Chief Minister declare in unified voice . even on this day----17th June 2010 ,that, Issac still maintains a wife and two children born out of his blood in US and as per the official records the wife is none other than the USAID lady. No incident of divorce occurred as per government record. So minister Issac has a dubious record of matrimony; he is divorced as per the CPM channel and not divorced as per the official government records .
Yes, in the political history of India never such an ugly incident occurred.An issue of cheating the public, speaking in two voices .Twin headed monstrosity stripped in naked sunlight .The channel of the governing party declares its minister a divorcee just to protect him from his nefarious political links, ; The chief minister, the general secretary of the CPM and the government officers who still hold the matrimony alive on records moan in silence as creatures dressed in motley, as clowns incapable of condemning the obscenity that rotates the controversy. Issac minister, who swells under the protection of the media institution holds key to the illicit foreign financial transactions in Kerala.. He is empowered with a blackmailing needle authenticated by CIA with which he sews up the mouth of the public persons who fell victim to to the smuggled foreign money transactions. Politicians of all hues and buttons have been trapped in the immoral traffic of illegitimate foreign financial grants and no politician or public person opens his mouth to condemn the stench of this obscenity that stifles the very breath of the law and order governance in the country.
The CIA minister is immune to the law and order of the land.The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam made a significant finding that an amount of rupees 16 crores has been smuggled to India violating Foreign Contribution Regulation Act ,for a decentralisation oriented project that was drafted directed and implemented by Issac. The contract for smuggling sixteen crores came into being as CDS, Issac's parent institution entered into an agreement with Tinburgen foundation a nonexistent foundation( as the nonexistent Nadur, Franke's place of residence in Kerala.) The story of Tinburgen founadation appears in an authentic book written by M.P.Parameswaran depicting the genesis of the project for which rupees sixteen crores were smuggled violating FCRA. Parameswaran in his book asserts the paternal role of Issac in the smuggled project. M.P. Parameswaran worked as the director of the project and there is solid evidence (given by CDS) to the fact that Issac played the role of the joint director of the project (inseminated by smuggled foreign thesis and smuggled foreign money,) at least for four years . The CDS authorities put forth all unclean pressures to obtain FCRAclearance for the project and fell flat at the feet of Dr. Manmohan Singh who then governed the finance of the country. The good name of Dr . K.N.Raj was dragged in to this spurious business but despite high level recommendations Issac could not obtain FCRA clearance, and he, in violation of the FCRA smuggled in the foreign fund .After the first course of the fund exhausted, the foreign source under the cover of Netherlands government, allotted 30 crores more for the extension of the project but the central government interfered and banned further continuation of the project. Paatom in its affidavit filed with the judicial court exposed the fact , with evidence, that the money smuggled in for the project was abused to generate fear of anarchy and terror among people as the proclaimed object of the project was elimination and exclusion of the state from local governance ( A USAID objective confessed by M.P. Paarameswaran ) The judicial officer in the judgment observed that Issac's organisation ,Parishat, which implemented the project made no attempt to counter the accusation of the anti-national monetary motivations in the project.
One wonders how a person who enacts the paternal role of a project with anti-national margins run by foreign fund smuggled in violation FCRA, is installed as minister in a state cabinet ; He sets illogical defence for a foreigner's stealthy business in Kerala in a place under a non existent village name, Nadur. His parent organisation signs a contract with a non existent foundation , Tinburgen Foundation which is yet another mystery like Nadur, and he fails to explain how such a fictitious foundation crept into the genesis text of the project which he formulated (though inseminated by foreign masters.). He stated his Franke was married to Barbara, which happens to be a false statement. His channel agent declares that he has been divorced of his US wife ,but the state government records stand unaffected by the story of the divorce, still entertaining the valid matrimonial incident .He does not make a honest statement of his asset and income hoarded with his US family and at the face of that inconvenient point he appears before the public as an aggrieved divorcee . He disowns the paternity of the foreign project inseminated by USAID, as violation of FCRA and the anti- natonal context of its procreation are established in the court of law. He disowns his US wife by words uttered in the channel as the US wife is irretrievable from the labyrinth of USAID and CIA.
He sits upon the head of Prakash Karat and dictates.We feel sympathy for the poor man Prakash. Let us hope that he is not a forged husband like Franke;letus hope he is not a forged divorcee like Issac; let us hope he is not a forged name like Nadur or Tinburgen foundation.
But not to be a forged communist ,is not a matter of hope or wishful thinking.
S.SUDHISH
No comments:
Post a Comment